Become a fan on Facebook Follow us on Twitter USDA Blog Feed Watch USDA videos on YouTube Subscribe to receive e-mail updates View USDA Photos on Flickr Subscribe to RSS Feeds

Secretary’s Column: Our Ongoing Commitment to Help Drought-Stricken Farmers and Ranchers

As drought continues to affect most of the country, our thoughts and prayers are with the thousands of farm families who have been affected by this disaster.

Earlier this summer the U.S. Department of Agriculture acted quickly to open conservation programs for emergency haying and grazing, lowered the interest rate for emergency loans, and worked with crop insurance companies to provide more flexibility to farmers.

On August 7, President Obama once again convened his White House Rural Council and announced several new measures the Administration is taking to help those impacted by the drought.

These include providing $30 million in additional funding to help producers access water supplies and repair land; increasing capacity for lending to small businesses, including farms and ranches; and waiving certain requirements on trucks, to get more drivers on the road in the relief effort.

President Obama stressed the need for the entire Administration to continue looking at further steps it can take to help.

I also know that Americans who don’t live on the farm or ranch are wondering what the drought means for them.

While this is a difficult time for many producers, it’s important to understand that thanks to advances in farming technology, more diverse global markets, lower farm debt and a stronger rural economy, farmers and ranchers are better prepared to face drought than in past years.

We may yet see strong yields in many parts of the country – we won’t know until the harvest is done. But we can say with confidence that Americans should not see significant short-term food price increases, or price spikes at the grocery store, due to drought.

While commodity prices are rising, they have very little impact on the prices folks pay at the grocery store.  Other factors such as energy and transportation costs comprise 86 percent of the food cost at the retail level, while raw commodities make up only about 14 percent.

In other words, even if every commodity (whole beef cattle, bushels of corn, tons of butter, etc.) doubled in price tomorrow, food prices would increase by just 14 percent. And that won’t happen.

We expect food price inflation this year to stay at the historical average – about 2.5 to 3 percent. Next year, we expect a slight increase of about 1 percent above those historical averages. But even next year’s forecast is well below some of the major inflation spikes we’ve witnessed in past years.

Today, USDA’s focus remains on doing all we can to support farm and ranch families in an uncertain time.

The biggest challenge that the President and I face in this effort is the fact that the 2008 Farm Bill disaster assistance programs expired at the end of last year.

On August 2 the House of Representatives passed a disaster assistance bill which would provide some drought assistance – as does the Senate’s comprehensive five-year Food, Farm and Jobs Bill that was passed in June.

Our preference remains that drought assistance be enacted as part of a Food, Farm and Jobs Bill, to ensure that USDA has tools to keep growing the rural economy, give more certainty to American farmers and ranchers, and provide help to producers in need.

As this drought continues, we’ll continue to call on Congress to get a Food, Farm and Jobs Bill passed. Meanwhile I promise Americans that President Obama and I won’t stop looking for ways to help farmers and ranchers in this difficult time.

Visit www.usda.gov/drought for the latest information regarding USDA’s Drought Disaster response and assistance. For an audio version of today’s column, please click here.

One Response to “Secretary’s Column: Our Ongoing Commitment to Help Drought-Stricken Farmers and Ranchers”

  1. Chris says:

    Lower the ethanol fuel quota. In the US an increase in fuel prices corresponds to the same overall increase in goods and services as a an increase in food prices, so locally it doesn’t make a great deal a sense to change the shift (aside from the inefficiency of burning ethanol pointing to a need for the practice to be abandoned altogether). The USDA should be concerned about this on an international level.

    Developing nations use oil to get places – not corn. Corn is something you eat when you’re too poor to afford a car, and there are several countries directly south of the US that have that issue. The Arab Spring was preceded by sharp increases in food supply, since it’s one thing to be jobless, but quite another to be jobless and hungry.

    Mexico is already having a destabilizing effect on the southern United States: How would unrest look over the rest of our back yard? Would authorities in those countries still have the resources to combat drug cartels when they’re busy trying to feed their own people?

    http://aheadoftheherd.com/Newsletter/2012/Provisions-Shortage-Sparked-Arab-Spring.htm

    Of course you could do the world a giant favor and drop ethanol altogether. That’d be both intelligent and rational, but I’ll settle for a semi-rational decision to lower the quota in the wake of this impending food shortage.

Leave a Reply